lundi 11 juin 2012

Back in early childhood, when I first saw the icon of Frankenstein's monster I was immediately charmed and possessed by a very strong spirit of inspiration that yield in my mind. The feeling of " That's the coolest horror  ever!"  I cant even remember where I first saw it, but I'm pretty sure I met it as a cartoon and only a few years later realized what it's based on, while stopped before a poster featuring Boris karloff  face. Up to now I've made two works, dedicated/ inspired by this creature. The first one was done after reading Mary Shelley's original book.  I was shocked from how different was what I read from the Idea I had installed in my had for so many years, based on the movies and all additional pulp icons that had accumulated with time.
I eventually exhibited this one at the "literal eyes" group exhibition in the London Miles gallery. Here I added a text that I wrote to explain what led me to create this work :

Oil on Canvas 39.5"x39.5"

  The icon of a flat headed, green skinned Goon, with two bolts protruding from his neck, today is an instantly recognizable cultural image of the 20th century.  The source of it though, is originated from Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus, the famous novel By Mary Shelley . Written by her at the age of eighteen on the rainy summer vacation in 1816, this book was an outraging new horror novel. Surprisingly gained a lot of success and recognition very quickly, it was also regarded as one of  first since fiction novels and  was even challenging for society to accept, that such a successful achievement was the share of such a Young female writer. Today however it is noted mainly as a landmark work of romantic and gothic literature.
My choice of using the face of Boris Karloff  from the well known 1931 Frankenstein film by James Whale was intuitive . Like most of my generation I had come to know the story of Frankenstein first with the medium of motion pictures. It was only later, that I red Shelley's novel and was exposed to whole new contents; ideas that deal with questions about humanity in both a moral and existential way, marking down principle core values like Family. Many of these values were never discussed in any of the many horror films that claim to have some relation (even if only by the title) to it. With time this icon of Frankenstein's monster had become a concept child, adopted and nurtured by countless films (horror and comedy) and TV series, mostly within the 30's until the 70's. After getting picked on so relentlessly over the decades, it is now hard to look at the monster's face and feel the same dread and horror that it once must have inspired. Dr. Frankenstein's Creation had been recycled through so many productions and flaunted in so much Pop and Youth culture, it can even be conceived as the green "Mickey Mouse" in a "Horror Disneyland".
I created the scene in this painting in the spirit of  Polaroid photographs, like the well known image of a kid with" Micky ", taken on a holiday . Twisted a little bit, the kid is replaced with a young punkish girl and instead of the carnival, it is placed in front of a familiar urban landscape; a scene from one of the neighborhoods where a young girl like her could live. The confident, naughty look of the amused girl while leading her unique escort by the hand is hinting that this time, the creature is the guest in her world.
The horrifying vision of this creature made from cadavers and woken up to live with a new identity so alien to mankind, is maybe the only idea that was conveyed from the original novel and still reflected in the Whale's films, though it holds within it another content: In the novel , there is a tragic development of events where the creature is been rejected by both his creator and society, causing him an extreme agony ,eventually pushing it to perform some horrible crimes, thus leading it to a catastrophe. Although the zombielike icon of the creature from broadcasting is a contrast to his rich and sensitive mind and intelligence from the novel, there is one  feature that is present in all of productions including the one depicted by Boris Karloff : The creature was innocent and pure at heart and wished to be beloved by man before turned in to a raging monster because Man's prejudice and intolerance rejected him violently.  I find the few Chapters of the novel where the creature tells his history of evolution most touching and fascinating. " I formed in my imagination a thousand pictures of presenting myself to them, and their reception of me. I imagined that they would be disgusted, until, by my gentle demeanour and conciliating words, I should first win their favour and afterwards their love".  As I read how the Creature longed for affection, to be accepted by man after discovering his world, I could guess by the hints and the story's beginning, It would obviously be a tragic failure. Still, I could not stop myself from imagining how it could have been different. How the story could have taken a different turn, twisted in a different direction and in the end bestow on the creature his 'happy ending'.
It is this wish that I tried to express in the painting; concealed within the parodic homage to the horror fiction. In this "vision" I tried to offer the "Monster" the fair chance that he deserved, a chance to win the love and affection, that I believe, all of my generation owe him after growing up educated and amused by his character and story.

I also framed this piece by myself . I made it all by hand using wood, resin and paint to achieve an imitation of a heavy construction  made of steel. the inspiration for it's design was German expressionist cinema and Art Nouveau, But more than all, I was inspired from the old Metro stations in Paris, Where I used to live at the time...

The second work, Frankie's was made after watching The Bride of Frankenstein Movie (in my opinion, a much better and improved sequel to the first Frankenstein Movie of James Whale . This work was actually made twice . The first try was about 80% done when I decided that I am not satisfied from the result hence to some very basic problems in  the structure and organisation of the painting . Those mistakes could not be changed at such an advanced stage of the work and I lost any motivation finishing it, being aware to those mistakes when all I could do is cover what has bin done with the final retouching ...  So eventually I started all over again. I did a massive study of lot's of new photo reference I've collected and shot during more than a week.  

Oil on canvas 25.5"x31.5"

I guess you can compere those two tries and understand what went wrong and what were my attempts. My friend Omer really liked them bout, so after  he was asking very kindly, I gave him the unfinished first version to hang on his wall.

            (the first try)

mardi 28 février 2012

Red Samurai.100 x74 cm oil on canvas

Well, it's been a while since the last time I've been updating my blog. I better do it from now on with some higher frequency.
I guess I've been lazy about it, but in general, I always find some excuse for why not doing anything including writing telling my self I could instead, better sketch or collect some reference for a new work. Well this is the life of an ADHD artist. Anyhow  I do find pleasure on sharing my works thoughts, and process with friend and anyone else who find it interesting.
Here is a work I made the last summer, while me and my girlfriend where residing for 2 month in Amstelveen near Amsterdam. We made this change so she could do some summer job she had found there selling some cosmetic products from the dead sea. When talking about it with her this days, I've come to understand,-- it seems that ,although I wasn't out of home most of the time, I liked Amsterdam a lot more than she did. Maybe it has to do with the bad experience of the shity job she had... Well, she survived it and I'm proud of her.

- The Red Samurai -

The inspiration for this piece came to me first, after I've found this yellow can photo on flicker. don't know why, but I really liked it and wanted to use it for a new piece.
Though  I didn't know how to arrange the rest of the set for the painting  and had no idea for what would be the "story"... A few days latter I met a friend I haven't seen for many years at the corner of a street . Surprised and again inspired, the idea of using here as a model popped out in my mind and as Shira accepted the offer we shot a session of photos at the same weekend.

I was very pleased from the set of photos I had in my camera, but for some reason I was not able to look at the yellow can image and taping it in my head to any of Shira's photos, resulting a good idea for a painting. The inspiration was gone !
It was about 4 month later when I browsed her set of photos once again to be engaged in a new idea for a work.
Shira did a great job and I'm happy I did not bother her for nothing with this shooting set ( that was almost embarrassing.) Anyway I would like to thank her, my dog Lizza( the second model) and also to RavenDragon from Canada Who took the initial yellow can photo that was eventually not included. however The lighting in the image,
is based upon his photo. When shooting Shira's photo set, I tried to illuminate it according to this yellow can. It is a very cool image and I hope one day I'll be able to use it for some work or a sketch.

Here you can find the reference I used . 
As you can see the are no real reference photos for the samurai robot, beside the two silver hydrants as the samurai's helmet. I had to imagine all of the rest, while looking at red cars and other metallic red objects in order to create it, was quiet challenging...  

                                          Work in progress.

dimanche 29 mai 2011

I really have lots of them , so I guess I will upload much of it in the next posts . 

First post

Well, this is my first post on my blog, so I guess I will upload some of  my actual works.
This days I'm doing lotsa' pin-ups. This are more pin up portraits, and they are painted on top of small wooden boxes , which I construct from pieces of wood I find in the the dump yard of where I'm living .
So this portrait is mainly a technical practice for me ...
It started about a year ago, when My friends where kind and gave me my desired birthday gift : the DvD guide of Jeffry Watts  for gesture portraits. I'ts funny how I can imagine the common reaction of many people, when they hear about learning to paint with a DvD guide . But, this is not the case, and before prejudicing  this terrific video one must see it first. (It's easy to find a brief of it in you-tub.) Anyway after watching Jeffry's demonstrations, and starting practicing it I've come to discover that I was not able to complete a "gesture portrait in the time limit of 30 minutes. What took him half an hour, to me was more like 2-3 hours, but the outcome was also very different. Maybe one of the reasons was that my paintings were a lot more tight brush stokes and edges ( he makes it very loose ). Still , to begin a portrait and finishing it  at the same day in one shot of few hours, was something very intuitive for me. (This is a great experience for any artist)
I tried fore about 5 times to limit myself for the30 minutes shot, like in the video, but I was left each time with  the heavy feeling of a mis-satisfaction from the result. Finally I've decided to not stay so strikingly committed to the DvD lesson and to more calmly  continued to work, until I  reach the graduate point of a small  portrait.(even though they were not very gesture.)
However, the basic of this gesture technic  is very resemble in my point of view to the technic  I recognize in classic/golden age pin-ups. This is the idea of  simplifying a sight to a  flat colors patches surface, piled up with brush . I think I once read somewhere this technic is also called the" put on " technic and I guess it relates to the order of the work that starts from putting on first the dark towns, afterwards the flash towns and afterwards the high lights, so the painter puts each level on it's place in order to have it all  together.
This technic is also very different from the glazing way of work that was more common in older days. Many artists are identified with this genre of fast figurative painting as masters of brushes like Zorn, Duvnek and Sargent, but there is something about Manet that to me, looks like the beginning of illustrative pin-up style . It might not be very accurate, to explain it , this way, but maybe,-- why not? -- it is very visible to me and it pops up in my eyes every time I notice how not messy he is in comparison to other  big modernists like Monet, Cezanne or any other impressionist. He doesn't mix many colors and texture in his figures flesh and their hair and clothe, many times might appear as a one color patch .
 I definitely recognize it as the beginning of pop and pin-up illustration. 
These days I try to limit myself  to work with a 5 color plate and I also try to have a less messy textures in my figures , as I find a lot of charm, in this simple and clean pin up style, and I hope with time I'll control it better. Such a qualification is also a big liberty for a painter who wishes his paintings won't look heavily over painted and explored. 
I guess I still have a long way to practice...